I went the opposite direction on my 30-1. Moved the traveler from just in front 
of the binnacle and between the seats (imagine a traveler which is two feet 
long) to the bridgedeck. Yes, it is a pain to get into the cabin when it is 
centered, but as soon as we stop sailing, it goes to one side and then there's 
no problem. And, when sailing, much of the time it is over to one side or the 
other of the companionway. It gives much better sail control.

But, I have no dodger...

Gary
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: dwight 
  To: cnc-list@cnc-list.com 
  Sent: Friday, January 24, 2014 9:18 AM
  Subject: Re: Stus-List 35-2 traveler question


  With end boom sheeting on my 35 MKII there is no interference with my rather 
large dodger on any point of sail.  I have a shorter boom than the standard so 
for my boat E= 12' or a touch more instead of 13.5' as listed under tech info 
on the C&C photoalbum site.  Further, mainsheet control from behind the helm or 
from either side of the boat on the helm seats is totally doable.I know because 
I do it.  The bridge deck mounted traveler is in the way sometimes for entering 
an exiting the cabin but that is a trade off against having a traveler in the 
way of transit to and from the helm.  I would not change the arrangement I hav 
on my 35 MKII and I feel that the high aspect ratio main sail is an improvement 
over the standard rig.

   


------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  From: CnC-List [mailto:cnc-list-boun...@cnc-list.com] On Behalf Of Della 
Barba, Joe
  Sent: January 24, 2014 10:03 AM
  To: cnc-list@cnc-list.com
  Subject: Re: Stus-List 35-2 traveler question

   

  I would go nuts with the traveler across the bridge deck. It would hose up 
how my dodger works and be a danger to people entering or exiting the cabin. I 
also love being able to drop the traveler without leaving the helm. YMMV and 
all ;)

   

  As for the mast step, the 35 MK I can suffer from a rotten mast step. I do 
not know if the MK II is any different. Good news is it is a relatively easy 
and cheap repair if you do it yourself. It is NOT the same as the issue with 
the MK III and maybe some others that involves the structure of the hull. Also 
if the MK II is like the MK I it is not hard to figure out if the boat has the 
issue from inside the boat.

   

  Joe Della Barba

  C&C 35 MK I

   



------------------------------------------------------------------------------


  _______________________________________________
  This List is provided by the C&C Photo Album
  http://www.cncphotoalbum.com
  CnC-List@cnc-list.com
_______________________________________________
This List is provided by the C&C Photo Album
http://www.cncphotoalbum.com
CnC-List@cnc-list.com

Reply via email to