If you want a cabin in each end have you looked at the C&C 34+ or the 37+ ?
 also known as the 34/36 and the 37/40

http://www.cncphotoalbum.com/brochures/40foot/40b3pg01.htm

Ken H.


On 31 December 2013 21:08, Dave Godwin <dave.god...@me.com> wrote:

> >  I expect the J/42 would be almost as good as a C&C. <
>
> Martin,
>
> Yup. I’ve raced on J/30’s, J/24’s, J/41’s, J/105’s, and J/120’s. I had a
> chance years ago to informally go head-to-head upwind against a new J/42 in
> flat water and ~15 knots of breeze. It couldn’t get away from us. I may
> have pissed the owner off. I have always been aware that the J-boat has
> done a very good job of “marketing" and I’ll leave it at that. I don’t want
> to start any flame wars.
>
> We’re in our early 60’s and I’m moving into cruising mode. The J/42 allows
> us (me) to handle a larger boat easily and comes with two separate cabins
> at each end of the boat which becomes a consideration when guests are
> involved for a week or so in in the Bahamas.
>
> If it were just me and my old race crew were available to crew, I’d buy a
> C&C 41.  :-)
>
> Cheers and Happy New Year. Off to a stupid party...
> Dave
>
> 1982 C&C 37 - Ronin
> Chesapeake Bay
>
> On Dec 31, 2013, at 7:52 PM, Martin DeYoung <mdeyo...@deyoungmfg.com>
> wrote:
>
> > … moving up to a J/42 for other reasons. <
>
> Dave,
>
> There are two J/42s in racer cruiser mode moored close to Calypso at
> Shilshole in Seattle.  One of them belongs to a friend and C/R class
> competitor.  We have C/R raced against each other for many years.  The J/42
> owes my old 43 about 12 seconds a mile and is clearly faster in light air.
> It takes TWS at 10+ for Calypso to gain especially on a reach or beat.
>
> Both J/42s are used extensively by couples in the retirement age/mode for
> cruising around the PNW.  If your plan is the cruise or C/R race
> short-handed I expect the J/42 would be almost as good as a C&C.
>
> Happy New Year,
>
> Martin
> Calypso
> 1970 C&C 43
> Seattle
> *From:* CnC-List 
> [mailto:cnc-list-boun...@cnc-list.com<cnc-list-boun...@cnc-list.com>
> ] *On Behalf Of *Dave Godwin
> *Sent:* Tuesday, December 31, 2013 4:34 PM
> *To:* cnc-list@cnc-list.com
> *Subject:* Re: Stus-List Scouting report on old C&C 38s
>
> Jim,
>
> I’m going to jump in and echo what others are saying: don’t get overly
> concerned about the downwind characteristics of the older IOR influenced
> hulls like C&C 38.
>
> If you are planning on pressing on as much canvass as possible while going
> downwind then you may have your hands full. But that’s racing. Ease off a
> bit. I’ve raced on IOR One-tons and there is a vast difference between that
> “IOR” and the “IOR shape" of the earlier C&C’s. For that matter I would
> suggest that one of loveliest but biggest handfuls of a boat downwind was
> the Ted Hood designed Gulfstar Custom 40. I loved that boat and almost
> bought one but, Lord, downwind with the ‘chute up there wasn’t a wheel big
> enough with enough purchase to keep it under control. “Broaches R Us.” The
> C&C 38 is not even in that category or the old racing IOR boats for that
> matter.
>
> Personally, I think that our C&C 37 is the follow-on to the C&C 38 (yes, I
> know  smaller but the specs put it at 37’ 9”...). A bit less radical in
> hull design and a bit better fins and rudder shape but essentially the same
> animal. We love our 37 although we are starting to think about moving up to
> a J/42 for other reasons. To echo what Martin’s wife says about the 36, my
> wife loves the 37 because it is the perfect blend of speed, comfort,
> sea-keeping, dryness and most importantly the ability to handle the loads
> and be able to manage around the docks by the two of us.
>
> The only bad thing I can say about the 38 is that the cockpit is bit
> pinched. So is ours. Eh...
>
> If you spring for it you won’t be unhappy. Really good looking and nice
> boat. What Martins says, it will do distance sailing comfortably.
>
> Cheers,
> Dave
> 1982 C&C 37 - Ronin
> Chesapeake Bay
>
> _______________________________________________
> This List is provided by the C&C Photo Album
> http://www.cncphotoalbum.com
> CnC-List@cnc-list.com
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> This List is provided by the C&C Photo Album
> http://www.cncphotoalbum.com
> CnC-List@cnc-list.com
>
>
_______________________________________________
This List is provided by the C&C Photo Album
http://www.cncphotoalbum.com
CnC-List@cnc-list.com

Reply via email to