Hi Chuck, The schedule was different for the 37+ (& XL). The XL was built with the 37+ schedule unless you specifically ordered the R schedule. For example, I have the build file for hull #72 and the sales order shows the owner paid $4,000.00 extra for the "37R Laminate Hull & Deck" in his build.
Don't forget the laminate wasn't just "1 oz chop and 1 oz mat", it also had two layers of C72K/100 Kevlar Fabmat, one layer inside the balsa and one out above the waterline. Below the waterline the layup was one layer 1 oz. chop, one layer 1 oz. mat and one layer of C77K/200 Kevlar Fabmat outside the balsa and one layer of C72K/100 Fabmat inside. This Fabmat is much heavier than the 1 oz. chop and 1 oz. mat at about 2.47 oz. for the C72K/100 and 4.94 oz. for the C77K/200. The layup was much heavier at the turn of the bilge across the (almost) flat bottom of the hull to the keel sump as an additional two layers of C77/200 Kevlar Fabmat were added and further, in the keel sump, the balsa was replaced with two layers of Compositex. Ken H. On 11 October 2013 08:41, Chuck S <cscheaf...@comcast.net> wrote: > Ken, That's interesting. 1 oz chop and 1 oz mat seem ridiculously light. > Doesn't say how many layers of each? Was the schedule different for the > plus? the XL? > > FWIW, I'm holding the 4" circle I cut from the deck when I installed solar > fans on my 34R. The piece measures 1/32 shy of 1" thick, and I can see the > many layers of glass, with two separate layers of kevlar with their yellow > fuzzy ends. The balsa is 3/4", outer glass layer w gel coat is 5/32", and > interior layer is 3/32" thick approximately. > > > Chuck > Resolute > 1990 C&C 34R > Atlantic City, NJ > ------------------------------ > *From: *"Ken Heaton" <kenhea...@gmail.com> > *To: *"cnc-list" <cnc-list@cnc-list.com> > *Sent: *Thursday, October 10, 2013 6:08:03 PM > > *Subject: *Re: Stus-List 34R hull > > From the factory drawings, the Laminate Schedule for the 1990 C&C 37 R was: > > C&C 37R Laminate, Hydrex resin used for the entire laminate. > > Topsides (total thickness 1.16") > > 1. Gelcoat > > 2. 1.0 oz. Chop > > 3. 1.0 oz. Mat > > 4. C72K/100 Kevlar Fabmat > > 5. 1” Aircraft Balsa Core > > 6. C72K/100 Kevlar Fabmat > > > > Bottom (total thickness 1.20") > > 1. Gelcoat > > 2. 1.0 oz. Chop > > 3. 1.0 oz. Mat > > 4. C77K/200 Kevlar Fabmat > > 5. 1” Aircraft Balsa Core > > 6. C72K/100 Kevlar Fabmat > > > I imagine the 34R would have bee about the same. > > The 37+ was a bit thicker, both topsides and bottom. > > > Ken H. > > > On 10 October 2013 16:40, Robert Abbott <robertabb...@eastlink.ca> wrote: > >> I always thought the 34R hull was made from kevlar.....am I wrong? >> >> Bob Abbott >> AZURA >> C&C 32 - 84 >> Halifax, N.S. >> >> On 2013/10/10 11:40 AM, Hoyt, Mike wrote: >> >> 34R was made by a completely different company than the 99. I believe >> was also not epoxy. >> >> ------------------------------ >> *From:* CnC-List >> [mailto:cnc-list-boun...@cnc-list.com<cnc-list-boun...@cnc-list.com>] >> *On Behalf Of *dwight veinot >> *Sent:* Thursday, October 10, 2013 11:33 AM >> *To:* cnc-list@cnc-list.com >> *Subject:* Re: Stus-List Looking to upsize. >> >> Mike >> >> The new hulls are stiff but they hole through a lot easier than the hull >> of an older C&C which has solid glass reinforced polyester...Once saw a >> power boat in slow reverse with the ss swim ladder supports pointing >> aft...go too close to a 34R and there was a hole through the hull...rather >> easy to puncture I thought >> >> >> On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 10:25 AM, Hoyt, Mike <mike.h...@impgroup.com>wrote: >> >>> Curtis >>> >>> Not really sure how the hulls are weaker. They are not made with solid >>> polyester based resin layup though. The C&C 99 is laid up using Epoxy >>> not polyester so in many respects could be considered stronger .. Or if >>> not stronger than certainly lighter for the equivalent amount of >>> strength? >>> >>> Speaking of Beneteaus. The Beneteau 367 sails well for racing and has a >>> huge interior for entertaining or cruising. Is priced about the same as >>> a C&C99 on the used market >>> >>> Mike >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: CnC-List [mailto:cnc-list-boun...@cnc-list.com] On Behalf Of >>> Curtis >>> Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2013 10:12 AM >>> To: cnc-list@cnc-list.com >>> Subject: Re: Stus-List Looking to upsize. >>> >>> The 99 has a weaker hull than the C&C boats? Right >>> >>> On 10/9/13, Hoyt, Mike <mike.h...@impgroup.com> wrote: >>> > There is a 99 one for sale in Nova Scotia. Google Scotia Coast >>> Yachts. >>> > >>> > Have sailed on a 99 numerous times. Is a great boat. >>> > >>> > Mike >>> > ________________________________ >>> > >>> > From: CnC-List [mailto:cnc-list-boun...@cnc-list.com] On Behalf Of >>> Marek >>> > Fluder >>> > Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2013 10:16 PM >>> > To: cnc-list@cnc-list.com >>> > Subject: Re: Stus-List Looking to upsize. >>> > >>> > >>> > I am opened for C&C 99 but there are few and far between. >>> > As for 33-II the admiral would prefer something newer than the 80's, >>> > which I do not oppose :) >>> > Kind regards, >>> > >>> > Marek >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > Sent from my iPad >>> > >>> > On 2013-10-08, at 11:33 AM, "Richard N. Bush" <bushma...@aol.com> >>> wrote: >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > If you're looking at the 320, why not look at the C&C 99? or a >>> > nice 33-II ? >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > Richard >>> > 1987 33-II, Ohio River, Mile 584 >>> > >>> > >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> This List is provided by the C&C Photo Album >> http://www.cncphotoalbum.com >> CnC-List@cnc-list.com >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > This List is provided by the C&C Photo Album > http://www.cncphotoalbum.com > CnC-List@cnc-list.com >
_______________________________________________ This List is provided by the C&C Photo Album http://www.cncphotoalbum.com CnC-List@cnc-list.com
