> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> Sent: Friday, February 08, 2013 12:19 PM
> To: Anthony Xu
> Cc: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [MERGE] Security Group in Advanced zone
> 
> On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 11:43:52AM -0800, Anthony Xu wrote:
> > I see your point, I think it should be case by case,
> >
> > In this feature, 100 line change are in 6 "manager" class, there is no unit
> framework for them, to be honest, I don't know to create the unit
> framework for manager class, I believe it is a big task. If the framework is
> there, I'm glad to add test cases inside framework to test the path I changed.
> >
> > If every function change needs unit test change, and as you said there is 
> > <1%
> unit coverage. This will be a big burden for developer, may slow down
> development. We may need to balance between them.
> 
> So if we don't start doing this now, when will we start?  I hope you get
> my point here...  yes, things slow down, but then they speed up.  Test
> coverage is critical to rapid development in such a large community.

We should start doing this now.  There was always a framework even back in 
ComponentLocator in 4.0 to mock up the managers/adapters injected into the 
manager/adapter being tested.  Now, with Spring it's even easier to use mockito 
to mock up the injected components.  The framework is there and I understand 
compare to before it might seem unfair that you had to do it but not people 
before but it has to start somewhere with someone.  Take a look at 
ApiRateLimitTest.java for how it's being done.  That's done even without an 
injection framework.  With the Spring injection framework it's even easier.  
Take a look at SecurityGroupManagerImpl2Test.java for one with Spring.

--Alex

Reply via email to