On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 11:43:52AM -0800, Anthony Xu wrote: > I see your point, I think it should be case by case, > > In this feature, 100 line change are in 6 "manager" class, there is no unit > framework for them, to be honest, I don't know to create the unit framework > for manager class, I believe it is a big task. If the framework is there, I'm > glad to add test cases inside framework to test the path I changed. > > If every function change needs unit test change, and as you said there is <1% > unit coverage. This will be a big burden for developer, may slow down > development. We may need to balance between them.
So if we don't start doing this now, when will we start? I hope you get my point here... yes, things slow down, but then they speed up. Test coverage is critical to rapid development in such a large community. -chip