On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 11:43:52AM -0800, Anthony Xu wrote:
> I see your point, I think it should be case by case,
> 
> In this feature, 100 line change are in 6 "manager" class, there is no unit 
> framework for them, to be honest, I don't know to create the unit framework 
> for manager class, I believe it is a big task. If the framework is there, I'm 
> glad to add test cases inside framework to test the path I changed.
> 
> If every function change needs unit test change, and as you said there is <1% 
> unit coverage. This will be a big burden for developer, may slow down 
> development. We may need to balance between them.

So if we don't start doing this now, when will we start?  I hope you get
my point here...  yes, things slow down, but then they speed up.  Test
coverage is critical to rapid development in such a large community.

-chip

Reply via email to