On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 2:43 PM, Anthony Xu <xuefei...@citrix.com> wrote: > I see your point, I think it should be case by case, > > In this feature, 100 line change are in 6 "manager" class, there is no unit > framework for them, to be honest, I don't know to create the unit framework > for manager class, I believe it is a big task. If the framework is there, I'm > glad to add test cases inside framework to test the path I changed. > > If every function change needs unit test change, and as you said there is <1% > unit coverage. This will be a big burden for developer, may slow down > development. We may need to balance between them. > > For this case, what's the next step? Call for vote, or Call for review?
There is no reprieve from a veto except for the vetoer to withdraw it. --David
