On Tuesday, February 17, 2015 at 6:47:59 PM UTC-5, Ben wrote: > > why not (mapcat next)? >
Yeah, that should work too, though conceptually trimming each part and then reflattening the partition are two separate steps of the computation. :) > The correct answer, obviously, is > > (->> s > (cons ::sentinel) > (partition n n nil) > (map next) > (mapcat identity)) > > with, in this case, s = (range 1 22) and n = 5 > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
