I would absolutely pay for something like this.

On Sunday, July 28, 2013 8:34:19 PM UTC-7, Colin Fleming wrote:
>
> Thanks for the thoughts, Matt - I agree it's a tough market for all the 
> reasons you describe. It's unfortunate that companies that pay for an 
> Ultimate license would have to pay again for this when the 
> JetBrains-developed extra languages (Python, Ruby) come for free. There's 
> not much to be done unfortunately except just be better than everyone else 
> :-)
>
>
> On 29 July 2013 09:07, Matt Hoffman <ma...@mhoffman.org <javascript:>>wrote:
>
>> I've been watching your fork on Github for a while -- I've been excited 
>> to see that someone is actively working on La Clojure. I would pay for an 
>> IntelliJ plugin that was significantly better than La Clojure, but I'm also 
>> aware that I'd be paying just for my preference of IntelliJ over Eclipse 
>> for mixed Java/Clojure development. For pure Clojure development, Emacs 
>> would also be a contender. So that would be a really tough market. 
>> It would be a tough sell for my company, as well. They pay for IntelliJ 
>> Ultimate licenses, and if we told them we wanted to add in $200 more for a 
>> Clojure plugin, I'd have to be prepared to re-open the "just use Eclipse" 
>> argument. 
>>
>> I'd also contribute to a Kickstarter, if you decided to go that route. I 
>> don't imagine you could make a living off of it that way, but you might be 
>> able to recoup some of your time.  A couple of developers in my company 
>> have talked about funding a bounty for nrepl integration alone. 
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 3:20 PM, kovas boguta 
>> <kovas....@gmail.com<javascript:>
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> My suggestion: release as open source, and then try a kickstarter to see 
>>> if there is interest in extending/continuing the project.
>>>
>>> IDE is a tough business. It has broken many. After all there is a reason 
>>> intellij open-sourced the core in the first place.
>>>
>>> Frankly I think there is a bigger market in using clojure to develop 
>>> better tools for other languages. If you have a nice intellij wrapper, then 
>>> you have a huge advantage in developing tooling in general. 
>>>
>>> On a side note, I would love to see intellij's widget library broken out 
>>> in a more stand-alone way, so we can develop sexy clojure apps with pure 
>>> jvm technology. Any thoughts on if that is technically doable?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 4:54 AM, Colin Fleming 
>>> <colin.ma...@gmail.com<javascript:>
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> I was planning to wait a little longer before going public, but since 
>>>> it's pretty relevant to the other IntelliJ thread going on at the moment I 
>>>> thought I'd jump in. For the last couple of months of happy unemployment 
>>>> I've been working on a fork of La Clojure which is now about 70% migrated 
>>>> to Clojure and significantly improved. It's a lot of work to develop a 
>>>> tool 
>>>> like this, and one of the options I'm considering is starting a company to 
>>>> develop it as a commercial product - JetBrains have never maintained 
>>>> development of La Clojure very actively. I've been doing a little market 
>>>> research but there's really not much data around about whether there are 
>>>> enough people working with Clojure to sustain a product like that, and 
>>>> also 
>>>> the community is currently very focused on open source.
>>>>
>>>> One problem is that the IDE space is already fairly fractured - there's 
>>>> Emacs and CCW, Clooj, Sublime Text and the promise of Light Table at some 
>>>> point, and of course the current public version of La Clojure. But there's 
>>>> still not a great option for something that's powerful but easy to use - 
>>>> CCW is probably the closest thing to this right now. However I think it's 
>>>> telling that a large fraction of people in the State of Clojure 2012 
>>>> survey 
>>>> still identified development tools as a major pain point.
>>>>
>>>> I think that the IntelliJ platform is a fantastic base to build 
>>>> something like this on. Clojure as a language makes it pretty challenging 
>>>> to develop a lot of the great functionality that JetBrains are famous for, 
>>>> but I think there's scope to do a lot of great things. Certainly for mixed 
>>>> Clojure/Java projects it would be difficult to beat, but even for Clojure 
>>>> only projects I can imagine a lot of fantastic functionality built on 
>>>> their 
>>>> infrastructure. My plan would be to release a standalone IDE and a plugin 
>>>> for people using IntelliJ Ultimate for web dev, Ruby/Python or whatever. 
>>>> Since it's mostly Clojure now (and I'm migrating what's left as I get to 
>>>> it) there's a real possibility of a Clojure plugin/extension API. I 
>>>> envision charging PyCharm/RubyMine type prices, say $200 for company 
>>>> licenses or $100 for individual developers.
>>>>
>>>> So, I'd love to hear what people think. I'd appreciate it if we could 
>>>> stay away from the politics of open source vs proprietary - several people 
>>>> have told me privately that they'd rather use OSS and that's fine, 
>>>> proprietary isn't for everyone. What I'd like to know is if the idea is 
>>>> appealing to many people here?
>>>>
>>>> In case it's a concern for anyone, I've discussed this with JetBrains.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for any feedback,
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Colin
>>>>
>>>> -- 
>>>> -- 
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>> Groups "Clojure" group.
>>>> To post to this group, send email to clo...@googlegroups.com<javascript:>
>>>> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with 
>>>> your first post.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>>> clojure+u...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>
>>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
>>>> --- 
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>> Groups "Clojure" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>>> an email to clojure+u...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>.
>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>>>  
>>>>  
>>>>
>>>
>>>  -- 
>>> -- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "Clojure" group.
>>> To post to this group, send email to clo...@googlegroups.com<javascript:>
>>> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with 
>>> your first post.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>> clojure+u...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>
>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
>>> --- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>> Groups "Clojure" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>> an email to clojure+u...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>.
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>>  
>>>  
>>>
>>
>>  -- 
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> Groups "Clojure" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to clo...@googlegroups.com<javascript:>
>> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with 
>> your first post.
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> clojure+u...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
>> --- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Clojure" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to clojure+u...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>  
>>  
>>
>
>

-- 
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to