On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 2:36 PM, Greg <g...@kinostudios.com> wrote: > On Jul 6, 2010, at 2:26 PM, Wilson MacGyver wrote: > >> On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 2:01 PM, Stuart Halloway >> <stuart.hallo...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> In my experience, unneeded versatility == support headache. >> >> I couldn't agree more. I'm happy to see selection of what goes into >> core and contrib has become more selective. > > > Yes, let's handicap ourselves and then disparage a useful macro as "unneeded." > > The -> and ->> macros aren't needed either, so why are they there? > > While we're at it, we should make it so that the + function takes only two > arguments because any more leads to "unneeded versatility" and therefore, > apparently, to "support headache." :-p
You know, just because you wrote a macro that you love and it works for you, doesn't mean it should get into clojure.core :) -- Omnem crede diem tibi diluxisse supremum. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
