On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 4:16 PM, Greg <g...@kinostudios.com> wrote: > > Have you checked for those? > > No, sorry, I think that's a rather unreasonable request. I'm not going to > spend hours sifting through the core and contrib just to jerk out examples > for you. > > I'd rather use logic and reason to make my case. > > - Greg
Greg you're enthusiasm is appreciated. But this ML is filled with talented and smart people who have an equal grasp of logic and reason who have been using Clojure for a couple years now and they aren't clamoring to your nice snippet of code. That's something to consider. It is interesting that this is not the first time such a feature has been requested. But again, I haven't ever had a need for such a general threading macro. One nice side effect of -> and ->> over --> is that it encourages everyone to consider the position of their arguments. Uniformity is nice. David -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
