There is not general agreement that something like --> is more readable. (I for 
one disagree, at least so far.)

Stu

> On Jul 6, 2010, at 8:23 AM, Meikel Brandmeyer wrote:
> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> this comes up once in a while. See eg. here for an in-depth
>> discussion: 
>> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure/browse_thread/thread/66ff0b89229be894/c3d4a6dae45d4852
> 
> So why hasn't it been incorporated yet into the standard library?
> 
> The --> macro (or the let-> mentioned there) is more powerful than -> and 
> ->>, and it also makes code more readable too. It seems strange therefore not 
> to have one.
> 
> - Greg
> 
> 
> 
>> Note, that you can ease your pain a little with #(): (-> 3 (#(+ 1 %
>> 4)) (#(prn "answer:" %))). This is rather ugly, though.
>> 
>> Sincerely
>> Meikel
>> 
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> Groups "Clojure" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
>> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
>> first post.
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Clojure" group.
> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
> first post.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en

Reply via email to