On Jul 6, 2010, at 11:47 AM, Stuart Halloway wrote:

> There is not general agreement that something like --> is more readable. (I 
> for one disagree, at least so far.)

I'm very curious as to why as I find it hard to even fathom how you could think 
it's less readable to be explicit about the location of the parameter.

Still, that doesn't change two facts:

1) I, and many others, find -> and ->> *less* readable because they do not 
indicate at all where the parameter is.

2) --> is more versatile than either -> and ->>.


So why keep it out of the core library?

- Greg


> Stu
> 
>> On Jul 6, 2010, at 8:23 AM, Meikel Brandmeyer wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>> this comes up once in a while. See eg. here for an in-depth
>>> discussion: 
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure/browse_thread/thread/66ff0b89229be894/c3d4a6dae45d4852
>> 
>> So why hasn't it been incorporated yet into the standard library?
>> 
>> The --> macro (or the let-> mentioned there) is more powerful than -> and 
>> ->>, and it also makes code more readable too. It seems strange therefore 
>> not to have one.
>> 
>> - Greg
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> Note, that you can ease your pain a little with #(): (-> 3 (#(+ 1 %
>>> 4)) (#(prn "answer:" %))). This is rather ugly, though.
>>> 
>>> Sincerely
>>> Meikel
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "Clojure" group.
>>> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
>>> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with 
>>> your first post.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
>> 
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> Groups "Clojure" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
>> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
>> first post.
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Clojure" group.
> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
> first post.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en

Reply via email to