On Jul 6, 2010, at 11:47 AM, Stuart Halloway wrote: > There is not general agreement that something like --> is more readable. (I > for one disagree, at least so far.)
I'm very curious as to why as I find it hard to even fathom how you could think it's less readable to be explicit about the location of the parameter. Still, that doesn't change two facts: 1) I, and many others, find -> and ->> *less* readable because they do not indicate at all where the parameter is. 2) --> is more versatile than either -> and ->>. So why keep it out of the core library? - Greg > Stu > >> On Jul 6, 2010, at 8:23 AM, Meikel Brandmeyer wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> this comes up once in a while. See eg. here for an in-depth >>> discussion: >>> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure/browse_thread/thread/66ff0b89229be894/c3d4a6dae45d4852 >> >> So why hasn't it been incorporated yet into the standard library? >> >> The --> macro (or the let-> mentioned there) is more powerful than -> and >> ->>, and it also makes code more readable too. It seems strange therefore >> not to have one. >> >> - Greg >> >> >> >>> Note, that you can ease your pain a little with #(): (-> 3 (#(+ 1 % >>> 4)) (#(prn "answer:" %))). This is rather ugly, though. >>> >>> Sincerely >>> Meikel >>> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "Clojure" group. >>> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com >>> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with >>> your first post. >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com >>> For more options, visit this group at >>> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >> Groups "Clojure" group. >> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com >> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your >> first post. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Clojure" group. > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your > first post. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en