Hi, On Jul 6, 5:47 pm, Stuart Halloway <stuart.hallo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> There is not general agreement that something like --> is more readable. (I > for one disagree, at least so far.) And it's implementation is not that trivial: user=> (macroexpand '(--> (launch-rockets-if-called-twice) (call :first _ :second _))) (call :first (launch-rockets-if-called-twice) :second (launch-rockets- if-called-twice)) Maybe there is just not much need for such a macro (at least for me, don't for the generality of users). 99% of my use cases can be handled with -> or ->> (or a combination there of). Sincerely Meikel -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
