I think I prefer find-first as well, rather than ffilter. I worry that ffilter isn't clear enough, and reads too similarly to filter.
On Mar 16, 7:51 am, Laurent PETIT <laurent.pe...@gmail.com> wrote: > Just to make me more enemies ;-), I would prefer, on the other hand, > find-first over ffirst (I'm not that nostalgic of some Common Lisp-like > abbreviations :-) > > No, really, ffirst is just 3 characters shorter than find-first, and looks > like a typo at first glance. > > -- > Laurent > > 2009/3/16 André Thieme <splendidl...@googlemail.com> > > > > > > > On 16 Mrz., 13:14, Rich Hickey <richhic...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Mar 14, 11:26 am, Stuart Sierra <the.stuart.sie...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > I've added a "seek" function to clojure.contrib.seq-utils: > > > > > (defn seek > > > > "Returns the first item of coll for which (pred item) returns > > > > logical true. > > > > Consumes sequences up to the first match, will consume the entire > > > > sequence > > > > and return nil if no match is found." > > > > [pred coll] > > > > (first (filter pred coll))) > > > > Sorry to jump in late, but one problem with seek is that it is a > > > homophone of seq. > > > > Did anyone consider ffilter or find-first? > > > In that case I would vote for ffilter. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
