> > > Another way to look at it - people are always asking for sequential > versions of find/contains?, so seq-find, seq-contains? Both would take > predicates instead of keys, and do sequential lookup. >
those discussions are what made me think of 'get'. (seq-get ...) or your names is starting to seem really accurate. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
