Just to make me more enemies ;-), I would prefer, on the other hand, find-first over ffirst (I'm not that nostalgic of some Common Lisp-like abbreviations :-)
No, really, ffirst is just 3 characters shorter than find-first, and looks like a typo at first glance. -- Laurent 2009/3/16 André Thieme <splendidl...@googlemail.com> > > On 16 Mrz., 13:14, Rich Hickey <richhic...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mar 14, 11:26 am, Stuart Sierra <the.stuart.sie...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > I've added a "seek" function to clojure.contrib.seq-utils: > > > > > (defn seek > > > "Returns the first item of coll for which (pred item) returns > > > logical true. > > > Consumes sequences up to the first match, will consume the entire > > > sequence > > > and return nil if no match is found." > > > [pred coll] > > > (first (filter pred coll))) > > > > Sorry to jump in late, but one problem with seek is that it is a > > homophone of seq. > > > > Did anyone consider ffilter or find-first? > > In that case I would vote for ffilter. > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
