On Mar 16, 3:38 pm, Stuart Sierra <the.stuart.sie...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mar 16, 8:14 am, Rich Hickey <richhic...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Sorry to jump in late, but one problem with seek is that it is a
> > homophone of seq.
>
> > Did anyone consider ffilter or find-first?
>
> I thought "find-first" was too long, since it's almost as long as
> (first (filter ...)
>
> "ffilter" looks funny, especially in a proportional font.
>
> Others I considered: find1, filter1, select1, pick, detect, spot,
> hit, ...
>
> "pick" might be good.
>
Another way to look at it - people are always asking for sequential
versions of find/contains?, so seq-find, seq-contains? Both would take
predicates instead of keys, and do sequential lookup.
Rich
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
