Hi Meikel,
That solution will work for this simple case, but my goal is to make
it possible to create lazy-sequences in a more straight-forward
manner. So that we can use the usual sequence functions (doseq, dorun,
loop) instead of the lazy-equivalents (for).
Is what I'm asking for impossible?
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
