Dave Warren wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Stephen Gran > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 05:22:56PM +0200, Bas van Rooijen said: >>> postfix would accept all three forms even >>> and why not ?? >> I assume you haven't looked at sendmail's security record. > > I, for one, have made it a point to not care. > >> This has >> been a pretty standard thing to do for a long time, and with even more >> characters than the milter currently uses. > > Can we get any email address banned in clamav just because at least one > software package has an associated exploit?
Especially when that exploit is easily, and MORE APPROPRIATELY, plugged in the software package itself, instead of acting as a potential bloating-agent in ClamAV? _______________________________________________ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
