Stephen Gran wrote: > I assume you haven't looked at sendmail's security record. This has > been a pretty standard thing to do for a long time, and with even more > characters than the milter currently uses.
That may be true, but filtering suspicious recipient addresses is beyond the scope of a virus-scanner, IMO. Much like my complaints about the PhishingScanURLs setting, I believe ClamAV should stick to the basics and leave other policy decisions alone. Regards, David. _______________________________________________ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
