David F. Skoll wrote: > Stephen Gran wrote: > >> I assume you haven't looked at sendmail's security record. This has >> been a pretty standard thing to do for a long time, and with even more >> characters than the milter currently uses. > > That may be true, but filtering suspicious recipient addresses is beyond > the scope of a virus-scanner, IMO. Much like my complaints about the > PhishingScanURLs setting, I believe ClamAV should stick to the basics and > leave other policy decisions alone.
Or at least leave them off by default, and make them things you can easily switch on and off. _______________________________________________ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
