On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 12:05:05PM -0400, David F. Skoll said: > Stephen Gran wrote: > > > I assume you haven't looked at sendmail's security record. This has > > been a pretty standard thing to do for a long time, and with even more > > characters than the milter currently uses. > > That may be true, but filtering suspicious recipient addresses is beyond > the scope of a virus-scanner, IMO. Much like my complaints about the > PhishingScanURLs setting, I believe ClamAV should stick to the basics and > leave other policy decisions alone.
I actually tend to agree with you on that, but the milter went far beyond that quite a long time ago. -- -------------------------------------------------------------------------- | Stephen Gran | He played the king as if afraid someone | | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | else would play the ace. -- John | | http://www.lobefin.net/~steve | Mason Brown, drama critic | --------------------------------------------------------------------------
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
