On 2025-04-29 10:31, Jacob Bachmeyer via cfarm-users wrote:
Fun... not only is the source completely missing but there is also no copy of the license in the distribution. So that makes two violations off the checklist.
A copy of GPL is actually installed as a manpage in ./share/man/man7/gpl.7
[...] Who wants to be the first to make an enemy of spacemit, or shall we send a circularly-signed letter from the compile farm users?I suggest handing the matter off to the FSF; they promise to start with a nice letter and escalate from there if needed. I would have quietly sent it to license-violat...@gnu.org but I did not want the FSF to get a big stack of reports if others had the same idea to quietly send it and it looks like the point-of-contact if FSF needs more information may need to be someone who can read Chinese. Or should the report to the FSF be a circularly-signed letter from the compile farm users? (i.e. Reply-To: cfarm-users)
I'm late but I just sent an email to FSF, CCed Jacob and Martin. I started this and it makes sense that I see through it :D
I made two corrections: (1) a copy of GPL is included; (2) their prebuilt binaries include glibc, gcc, binutils, llvm-toolchain (irrelevant). Not sure if Spacemit made changes to glibc.
Golly, love and do what you want, but don't ever upset the cfarm-users!😂
-- Jing Luo About me: https://jing.rocks/about/ GPG Fingerprint: 4E09 8D19 00AA 3F72 1899 2614 09B3 316E 13A1 1EFC
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ cfarm-users mailing list cfarm-users@lists.tetaneutral.net https://lists.tetaneutral.net/listinfo/cfarm-users
