On 4/28/25 03:26, Martin Guy via cfarm-users wrote:
On 28/04/25 04:25, Jacob Bachmeyer via cfarm-users wrote:
So then we run down the details according to <URL:https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-violation.html>:

  * the precise name of the product
  * the name of the person or organization distributing it
  * email addresses, postal addresses and phone numbers for how to
    contact the distributor(s)
  * the exact name of the package whose license is violated
  * how the license was violated

You have the first two of those; I believe Martin Guy found at least some email addresses; our discussion seems to indicate that we are looking at GPL violations on both GCC and GNU binutils; and of course, the sources are completely missing.

The FSF collects reports at: license-violat...@gnu.org


Not even a COPYING file, just binary blobs of GCC and LLVM

It could do bitcoin mining for all we know

Fun... not only is the source completely missing but there is also no copy of the license in the distribution.  So that makes two violations off the checklist.

business@ and hr@ are given at the bottom of spacemit.com

and there is phone number too. I didn't find an address but

as they are a (big!) registered company it must be findable.

In their Privacy Policy it says; "If you have any questions,

comments, suggestions or complaints about our policies

and the handling of your personal information,

please send an email to [*busin...@spacemit.com*] [...]

and we will reply within 14 days" so I guess that's the one.


Who wants to be the first to make an enemy of spacemit, or

shall we send a circularly-signed letter from the compile farm users?

I suggest handing the matter off to the FSF; they promise to start with a nice letter and escalate from there if needed.

I would have quietly sent it to license-violat...@gnu.org but I did not want the FSF to get a big stack of reports if others had the same idea to quietly send it and it looks like the point-of-contact if FSF needs more information may need to be someone who can read Chinese.

Or should the report to the FSF be a circularly-signed letter from the compile farm users? (i.e. Reply-To: cfarm-users)

Golly, love and do what you want, but don't ever upset the cfarm-users!

😂


-- Jacob
_______________________________________________
cfarm-users mailing list
cfarm-users@lists.tetaneutral.net
https://lists.tetaneutral.net/listinfo/cfarm-users

Reply via email to