On 2025-04-23 13:13, Jacob Bachmeyer wrote:
On 4/22/25 06:13, Jing Luo via cfarm-users wrote:[...] Finally I also found a "we-violate-the-GPL-because-we-don't-care" compiler [5], a sourceless, prebuilt and customized gnu toolchain by Spacemit with "--build=x86_64-linux-gnu --host=riscv64-linux-gnu", which is linked from [6]. This one deserves a ((dis)honorary) mention because cfarm95 runs on the Spacemit CPU. [...] [5] https://archive.spacemit.com/toolchain/ [6] https://milkv.io/docs/jupiter/development-guide/kernel-compilationHmmm, a blatant GPL violation on GCC? Have you contacted [A1] the FSF about it? (I initially thought about quietly passing this along myself or giving this suggestion off-list, then realized that I should reply publicly to avoid many private responses with the same suggestion or deluging the FSF with reports.) [A1] https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-violation.html
Not yet: I thought I should at least ask for the source code before reporting it to FSF. But unfortunately I can't find any email address or postal address or phone number to contact them...
On the other hand, I found a forum topic related to it [7]: (a rough translation from Chinese) [Q3] Is the source code of Spacemit's gcc available[A3] No. But [we] didn't make a lot of changes on gcc, basically it's [the same as] the open source (sic.) version. After all, the only thing added was assembler support, i.e. changing binutils. The patches supporting the instruction will be ready to be released, so that everyone who build their own toolchain can also patch [it] themselves.
Oh well. [7] https://forum.spacemit.com/t/topic/387 -- Jing Luo About me: https://jing.rocks/about/ GPG Fingerprint: 4E09 8D19 00AA 3F72 1899 2614 09B3 316E 13A1 1EFC
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ cfarm-users mailing list cfarm-users@lists.tetaneutral.net https://lists.tetaneutral.net/listinfo/cfarm-users
