On Sun, 14 Mar 2010 20:15:51 -0400, Pavel Pavlov <pa...@summit-tech.ca>
wrote:
>> On Sun, 2010-03-14 at 04:25 -0400, Pavel Pavlov wrote:
>> > Sorry, I should have give more info. Off course default vanilla armv4
>> will work,
>> > but I need to enable armv7 + neon compilation. Currently, It won't
>> compile the
>> > code: error, unsupported ins for this arch.
>> 
>> arm-mingw32ce-gcc --target-help mentions a lot of options.
> 
> 
> That's a standard switch that's mentioned in arm-mingw32ce-gcc --help.
It
> doesn't mention anything on how to get list of supported target CPU's or
> arch's.
> 
>> 
>> > By the way, I have a few minor local changes in my copy related to
>> coredll.dll vs coredll (see attachement).
>> 
>> I looked in my mailing archive but I can't find info about this - but I
>> seem to remember that this has been brought up before.
>> 
>> What exactly is the problem this solves, and why haven't we applied
>> this
>> fix before ?
> 
> Well, for some reason it was all written as COREDLL instead of
> coredll.dll. That means that many binaries are linked to COREDLL
(without
> .dll suffix). There is no such behavior with ms tools, they always link
to
> coredll.dll. Moreover, as far as I remember the way loader works is
this:
> if there is no COREDLL it will try to load coredll.exe then coredll.dll,
> which means that if somebody "maliciously" creates a
\windows\coredll.exe
> then everything that links to coredll will fail to load. I didn't very
that
> though, still I don't see a reason to link to coredll instead of
> coredll.dll (plus in the list of dependencies (depends.exe) I don't see
> multiple dependencies on coredll and coredll.dll at the same time.

I have already reported that kind of things hundred times with no result
even on binutils mailing list...





------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel&#174; Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________
Cegcc-devel mailing list
Cegcc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cegcc-devel

Reply via email to