On Sat, 13 Mar 2010, Danny Backx wrote:

> On Tue, 2010-03-09 at 01:41 -0500, Pavel Pavlov wrote:
>> For some reason in cegcc sdk some functions ifdefed this way:
>>
>> #if (_WIN32_WINNT >= 0x0501)
>> void WSAAPI freeaddrinfo (struct addrinfo*);
>> int WSAAPI getaddrinfo (const char*,const char*,const struct addrinfo*,
>>                      struct addrinfo**);
>> int WSAAPI getnameinfo(const struct sockaddr*,socklen_t,char*,DWORD,
>>                     char*,DWORD,int);
>> ...
>>
>>
>> Even though these are awailable as of Windows CE .NET 4.1 and later: 
>> http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms910263.aspx
>> Mobile 6 sdk doesn't have any ifdef's around them also, so I think this 
>> header needs to be modified.
>
> Is it just that chunk that needs fixing ? Then I could change to
>
> #if (_WIN32_WINNT >= 0x0501) || defined(_WIN32_WCE)

shouldn't the version of _WIN32_WCE be tested ?

Vincent Torri

>
>       Danny
> -- 
> Danny Backx ; danny.backx - at - scarlet.be ; http://danny.backx.info
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval
> Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
> proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
> See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
> _______________________________________________
> Cegcc-devel mailing list
> Cegcc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cegcc-devel
>
>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________
Cegcc-devel mailing list
Cegcc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cegcc-devel

Reply via email to