> On Sun, 2010-03-14 at 04:25 -0400, Pavel Pavlov wrote:
> > Sorry, I should have give more info. Off course default vanilla armv4
> will work,
> > but I need to enable armv7 + neon compilation. Currently, It won't
> compile the
> > code: error, unsupported ins for this arch.
> 
> arm-mingw32ce-gcc --target-help mentions a lot of options.


That's a standard switch that's mentioned in arm-mingw32ce-gcc --help. It 
doesn't mention anything on how to get list of supported target CPU's or arch's.

> 
> > By the way, I have a few minor local changes in my copy related to
> coredll.dll vs coredll (see attachement).
> 
> I looked in my mailing archive but I can't find info about this - but I
> seem to remember that this has been brought up before.
> 
> What exactly is the problem this solves, and why haven't we applied
> this
> fix before ?

Well, for some reason it was all written as COREDLL instead of coredll.dll. 
That means that many binaries are linked to COREDLL (without .dll suffix). 
There is no such behavior with ms tools, they always link to coredll.dll. 
Moreover, as far as I remember the way loader works is this: if there is no 
COREDLL it will try to load coredll.exe then coredll.dll, which means that if 
somebody "maliciously" creates a \windows\coredll.exe then everything that 
links to coredll will fail to load. I didn't very that though, still I don't 
see a reason to link to coredll instead of coredll.dll (plus in the list of 
dependencies (depends.exe) I don't see multiple dependencies on coredll and 
coredll.dll at the same time.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________
Cegcc-devel mailing list
Cegcc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cegcc-devel

Reply via email to