On Sun, 2010-03-14 at 03:22 -0400, Pavel Pavlov wrote:
> > shouldn't the version of _WIN32_WCE be tested ?
>
>
> Well, wince sdk from ms doesn't have any tests, msdn says that the api is
> available from ce.net 4.1 so probably that should be tested then.
Just applied a fix.
> Guys, just a side note... I need to build for qualcom's snapdragon but I have
> no idea what switches I need to use to enable suitable arm version. Is there
> a magic combination to make cegcc printout list of available target -mcpu and
> -march switches? Right now I go to cegcc sources and see list of defined cpu
> in the source code and try using them, but nothing works for me (invalid
> switch). I'll try to rebuild latest version and I'll see if I can use that. I
> tried to use it a while ago, but my binaries wouldn't run if built by that
> version of cegcc (I'm mostly doing some voice/video stuff and ffmpeg)
Not sure what you're asking. It's an ARM chip so the standard settings
should just work. You probably know that. So you must be asking for
something specific, but what ?
The gcc mailing list(s) may also be a good place to ask this question ..
Danny
--
Danny Backx ; danny.backx - at - scarlet.be ; http://danny.backx.info
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________
Cegcc-devel mailing list
Cegcc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cegcc-devel
