> On Sun, 2010-03-14 at 03:22 -0400, Pavel Pavlov wrote: > > > shouldn't the version of _WIN32_WCE be tested ? > > > > > > Well, wince sdk from ms doesn't have any tests, msdn says that the > api is available from ce.net 4.1 so probably that should be tested > then. > > Just applied a fix. > > > Guys, just a side note... I need to build for qualcom's snapdragon > but I have no idea what switches I need to use to enable suitable arm > version. Is there a magic combination to make cegcc printout list of > available target -mcpu and -march switches? Right now I go to cegcc > sources and see list of defined cpu in the source code and try using > them, but nothing works for me (invalid switch). I'll try to rebuild > latest version and I'll see if I can use that. I tried to use it a > while ago, but my binaries wouldn't run if built by that version of > cegcc (I'm mostly doing some voice/video stuff and ffmpeg) > > Not sure what you're asking. It's an ARM chip so the standard settings > should just work. You probably know that. So you must be asking for > something specific, but what ?
Sorry, I should have give more info. Off course default vanilla armv4 will work, but I need to enable armv7 + neon compilation. Currently, It won't compile the code: error, unsupported ins for this arch. By the way, I have a few minor local changes in my copy related to coredll.dll vs coredll (see attachement).
coredll.patch
Description: coredll.patch
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________ Cegcc-devel mailing list Cegcc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cegcc-devel
