In the keyboard section of the attached document there are instructions for
testing with a terminal & USB>TTL RS-232 adapter.

On Sat, Feb 15, 2025 at 12:43 AM Steve Lewis <lewiss...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Thanks, I had forgotten about the Kaypro.  Looks like it uses a "custom"
> 4-pin wire (one of them being 5V power).  So just level-shift the TX/RX
> pins through a MAX232 IC and it would talk to another R-232 system at 300
> baud eh?   Might have to seek out a lone Kaypro keyboard to give it a try.
>
> I suspect some of the "serial style" mid-1980s IBM Model M keyboards are
> similar.    But I'm still wondering if anyone used this concept in the late
> 1960s - teletypes were expensive, flipping switches was tedious, so
> keyboard alternates were hot items by early 70's (hence the TVT popularity).
>
> On Fri, Feb 14, 2025 at 5:28 PM Mike Stein <mhs.st...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I believe that at least Kaypro used a TTL form of RS-232 for the
>> keyboard; in fact, ISTR using an RS M100 notebook (+/- 5V) in place of a
>> keyboard in distant days.
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 14, 2025 at 12:27 PM Steve Lewis via cctalk <
>> cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Rick Bensene:
>>>
>>> > I will try to find my Xircom parallel port Modem and Ethernet adapters
>>> in
>>> > a box somewhere in my storage area and take a photo of them.  If I can
>>> find
>>> > them, I’ll post a link here to the photos so those in disbelief can see
>>> > them.
>>>
>>>
>>> That'd be neat to see, if you do find the Xircom parallel modem.  I've
>>> seen
>>> combo ones and their "parallel-ethernet" devices (which seem to go for
>>> quite a premium these days), but not the modem only.  Suppose they
>>> weren't
>>> too popular, as even laptops started to have built in modems.
>>>
>>> These days, I do use an SDLPT, that lets you use SD-cards to transfer
>>> data
>>> into a system over the parallel port.  I suppose that's the same general
>>> principle (of read/writing one full byte at a time to a device).   I
>>> haven't measured its performance yet (but would characterize it as being
>>> comparable to a physical 3.5" floppy disk drive kind of performance - I
>>> think copying Quake took over 40 minutes, something like that; but I'd
>>> like
>>> to get more accurate about it, down to an actual bytes-per-second rate).
>>> Measuring that might give me an answer on how fast something like
>>> Laplink/Interlink cable should be able to perform.
>>>
>>> As another experiment, I'll drop that ~7MHz 16550 serial card into a 386,
>>> and see if I can get a 386 to push data out on RS-232 faster than 115200.
>>> It should, but we'll see!
>>>
>>>
>>> And I think I will do an RS-232 themed talk in June VCF, if a spot is
>>> still
>>> open - I think I have enough now to make it interesting.   One area I'm a
>>> little stuck on is verifying that anyone actually did make an RS-232
>>> keyboard. Even for TV Typewriter, I'm not sure if I'd characterize that
>>> as
>>> RS-232 related.  And Gordon Bell integrated an ASR-33 (current loop) to
>>> the
>>> PDP-1, but might not be accurate to call that RS-232 (but can't a current
>>> loop based thing be adapted to voltage?).  I thought the POLY-88 keyboard
>>> was RS-232, but it'll be awhile before I can get back to that equipment.
>>>
>>>
>>> -Steve
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 6:32 PM Rick Bensene via cctalk <
>>> cctalk@classiccmp.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> > Henry wrote:
>>> >
>>> > > I remember those, and when I went searching to look for more
>>> information
>>> > on them I found something I > hadn't stumbled on before - apparently
>>> Xircom
>>> > made a parallel port Ethernet adapter.  It must have
>>> > > been pretty painful.  The parallel port wasn't a great high speed
>>> > interface…
>>> >
>>> > ----
>>> >
>>> > Yes, I have one of those parallel port Ethernet devices too.  But,
>>> > remember, back at that time, Ethernet was commonly 10Mb/Sec.  I think
>>> that
>>> > 100Mb/Sec was only located in high-end datacenters and was very
>>> expensive.
>>> > For a laptop that didn’t have a PCMCIA port, and you wanted it on an
>>> > Ethernet network, this was an acceptable way to go.  Performance wasn’t
>>> > great, but most of the time laptops like this were used for TELNET
>>> > connections to other hosts on the local network for “GREEN SCREEN” type
>>> > applications that ran entirely on the remote host.  Performance in such
>>> > cases wasn’t nearly as much of a concern as it would be in the not too
>>> > distant future.
>>> >
>>> > I will try to find my Xircom parallel port Modem and Ethernet adapters
>>> in
>>> > a box somewhere in my storage area and take a photo of them.  If I can
>>> find
>>> > them, I’ll post a link here to the photos so those in disbelief can see
>>> > them.
>>> >
>>> > -Rick
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > From: Henry Bent [mailto:henry.r.b...@gmail.com]
>>> > Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2025 3:54 PM
>>> > To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts <
>>> > cctalk@classiccmp.org>
>>> > Cc: Rick Bensene <ri...@bensene.com>
>>> > Subject: Re: [cctalk] Re: RS232 - parallel modems!?
>>> >
>>>
>>

Reply via email to