cctalk  

Messages by Date

• 2025/02/28 [cctalk] Re: FYI: The ongoing, 40 years long search for Aleph Null William Sudbrink via cctalk
• 2025/02/28 [cctalk] Re: Anybody need a dot matrix impact printer? Liam Proven via cctalk
• 2025/02/27 [cctalk] Re: Thousands of new Data General documents added to the on-line archives... Dominique Carlier via cctalk
• 2025/02/27 [cctalk] FYI: The ongoing, 40 years long search for Aleph Null Tomasz Rola via cctalk
• 2025/02/26 [cctalk] Thousands of new Data General documents added to the on-line archives... Bruce Ray via cctalk
• 2025/02/24 [cctalk] Re: VCF Montréal Survey Jeffrey Brace via cctalk
• 2025/02/23 [cctalk] VCF Montréal Survey Jeffrey Brace via cctalk
• 2025/02/23 [cctalk] Re: Might be antique computer parts Van Snyder via cctalk
• 2025/02/23 [cctalk] Re: Might be antique computer parts Paul Koning via cctalk
• 2025/02/23 [cctalk] Rainbow 100A Video Fault (also posted on VCF) Rob Jarratt via cctalk
• 2025/02/22 [cctalk] Anybody need a dot matrix impact printer? Van Snyder via cctalk
• 2025/02/22 [cctalk] Might be antique computer parts Van Snyder via cctalk
• 2025/02/22 [cctalk] Re: Wikipedia (Was: Elliott Algol) Tom Gardner via cctalk
• 2025/02/22 [cctalk] Re: Classic computers with more than one stack pointer, but not FORTH machines. Paul Koning via cctalk
• 2025/02/21 [cctalk] Re: Classic computers with more than one stack pointer, but not FORTH machines. ben via cctalk
• 2025/02/21 [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Paul McJones via cctalk
• 2025/02/21 [cctalk] Re: Classic computers with more than one stack pointer, but not FORTH machines. Wayne S via cctalk
• 2025/02/21 [cctalk] Re: Classic computers with more than one stack pointer, but not FORTH machines. Paul Koning via cctalk
• 2025/02/21 [cctalk] Re: Wikipedia (Was: Elliott Algol) Antonio Carlini via cctalk
• 2025/02/21 [cctalk] Re: Wikipedia (Was: Elliott Algol) Alan Perry via cctalk
• 2025/02/21 [cctalk] Re: Wikipedia (Was: Elliott Algol) Chuck Guzis via cctalk
• 2025/02/21 [cctalk] Re: Wikipedia (Was: Elliott Algol) jim stephens via cctalk
• 2025/02/21 [cctalk] Re: Classic computers with more than one stack pointer, but not FORTH machines. ben via cctalk
• 2025/02/21 [cctalk] Re: Wikipedia (Was: Elliott Algol) Alan Perry via cctalk
• 2025/02/21 [cctalk] Re: Classic computers with more than one stack pointer, but not FORTH machines. John via cctalk
• 2025/02/21 [cctalk] Re: Wikipedia (Was: Elliott Algol) David Wise via cctalk
• 2025/02/21 [cctalk] Re: Wikipedia (Was: Elliott Algol) jim stephens via cctalk
• 2025/02/20 [cctalk] Re: Wikipedia (Was: Elliott Algol) bobh--- via cctalk
• 2025/02/20 [cctalk] Re: Wikipedia (Was: Elliott Algol) Nigel Johnson Ham via cctalk
• 2025/02/20 [cctalk] IBM 4506 (old message) Tommy Chang via cctalk
• 2025/02/20 [cctalk] Re: Classic computers with more than one stack pointer, but not FORTH machines. Paul Koning via cctalk
• 2025/02/20 [cctalk] Re: Classic computers with more than one stack pointer, but not FORTH machines. Milo Velimirović via cctalk
• 2025/02/20 [cctalk] Re: Classic computers with more than one stack pointer, but not FORTH machines. paul.kimpel--- via cctalk
• 2025/02/20 [cctalk] Re: Classic computers with more than one stack pointer, but not FORTH machines. paul.kimpel--- via cctalk
• 2025/02/20 [cctalk] Re: Classic computers with more than one stack pointer, but not FORTH machines. Mike Katz via cctalk
• 2025/02/20 [cctalk] Wikipedia (Was: Elliott Algol) Alan Perry via cctalk
• 2025/02/20 [cctalk] Re: Classic computers with more than one stack pointer, but not FORTH machines. Jonathan Stone via cctalk
• 2025/02/20 [cctalk] Re: Classic computers with more than one stack pointer, but not FORTH machines. Paul Koning via cctalk
• 2025/02/20 [cctalk] Re: Classic computers with more than one stack pointer, but not FORTH machines. paul.kimpel--- via cctalk
• 2025/02/20 [cctalk] Re: Classic computers with more than one stack pointer, but not FORTH machines. Christian Corti via cctalk
• 2025/02/19 [cctalk] Re: Classic computers with more than one stack pointer, but not FORTH machines. Chuck Guzis via cctalk
• 2025/02/19 [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Gary Grebus via cctalk
• 2025/02/19 [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Chuck Guzis via cctalk
• 2025/02/19 [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Paul Koning via cctalk
• 2025/02/19 [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Gary Grebus via cctalk
• 2025/02/19 [cctalk] Re: Classic computers with more than one stack pointer, but not FORTH machines. Paul Koning via cctalk
• 2025/02/19 [cctalk] Re: Classic computers with more than one stack pointer, but not FORTH machines. Mike Katz via cctalk
• 2025/02/19 [cctalk] Re: Classic computers with more than one stack pointer, but not FORTH machines. StricK via cctalk
• 2025/02/19 [cctalk] Re: Classic computers with more than one stack pointer, but not FORTH machines. Chuck Guzis via cctalk
• 2025/02/18 [cctalk] Re: Classic computers with more than one stack pointer, but not FORTH machines. Gavin Scott via cctalk
• 2025/02/18 [cctalk] Re: Classic computers with more than one stack pointer, but not FORTH machines. John via cctalk
• 2025/02/18 [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Jon Elson via cctalk
• 2025/02/17 [cctalk] Re: Classic computers with more than one stack pointer, but not FORTH machines. jim stephens via cctalk
• 2025/02/17 [cctalk] HAWLEY X063X Mark II and XEROX Star mice hupfadekroua via cctalk
• 2025/02/17 [cctalk] VCF SoCal 2025 recap Steve Lewis via cctalk
• 2025/02/17 [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Paul McJones via cctalk
• 2025/02/17 [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Van Snyder via cctalk
• 2025/02/17 [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Paul Koning via cctalk
• 2025/02/17 [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Will Cooke via cctalk
• 2025/02/17 [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Martin Bishop via cctalk
• 2025/02/17 [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Paul McJones via cctalk
• 2025/02/17 [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Chuck Guzis via cctalk
• 2025/02/17 [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Paul McJones via cctalk
• 2025/02/17 [cctalk] Re: Classic computers with more than one stack pointer, but not FORTH machines. Mike Katz via cctalk
• 2025/02/17 [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Van Snyder via cctalk
• 2025/02/17 [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Chuck Guzis via cctalk
• 2025/02/17 [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Paul Koning via cctalk
• 2025/02/17 [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Paul Koning via cctalk
• 2025/02/17 [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Van Snyder via cctalk
• 2025/02/17 [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol ben via cctalk
• 2025/02/17 [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Van Snyder via cctalk
• 2025/02/17 [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Van Snyder via cctalk
• 2025/02/17 [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Paul Koning via cctalk
• 2025/02/17 [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Paul Koning via cctalk
• 2025/02/17 [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Adrian Godwin via cctalk
• 2025/02/17 [cctalk] Re: Classic computers with more than one stack pointer, but not FORTH machines. Frank Leonhardt via cctalk
• 2025/02/17 [cctalk] Re: Classic computers with more than one stack pointer, but not FORTH machines. Mike Katz via cctalk
• 2025/02/17 [cctalk] Re: Classic computers with more than one stack pointer, but not FORTH machines. ben via cctalk
• 2025/02/17 [cctalk] Re: Classic computers with more than one stack pointer, but not FORTH machines. Martin Bishop via cctalk
• 2025/02/17 [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Chuck Guzis via cctalk
• 2025/02/17 [cctalk] Re: Classic computers with more than one stack pointer, but not FORTH machines. Chuck Guzis via cctalk
• 2025/02/17 [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Chuck Guzis via cctalk
• 2025/02/17 [cctalk] Re: Classic computers with more than one stack pointer, but not FORTH machines. Jon Elson via cctalk
• 2025/02/17 [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol ben via cctalk
• 2025/02/17 [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Jon Elson via cctalk
• 2025/02/17 [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Paul Koning via cctalk
• 2025/02/17 [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol David Wise via cctalk
• 2025/02/17 [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Peter Corlett via cctalk
• 2025/02/17 [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Paul Koning via cctalk
• 2025/02/17 [cctalk] Re: Classic computers with more than one stack pointer, but not FORTH machines. Paul Koning via cctalk
• 2025/02/17 [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Paul Koning via cctalk
• 2025/02/17 [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Paul Koning via cctalk
• 2025/02/17 [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Paul Koning via cctalk
• 2025/02/17 [cctalk] Re: Classic computers with more than one stack pointer, but not FORTH machines. StricK via cctalk
• 2025/02/17 [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Paul Koning via cctalk
• 2025/02/17 [cctalk] Re: Classic computers with more than one stack pointer, but not FORTH machines. Frank Leonhardt via cctalk
• 2025/02/17 [cctalk] Re: Classic computers with more than one stack pointer, but not FORTH machines. Paul Koning via cctalk
• 2025/02/17 [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Frank Leonhardt via cctalk
• 2025/02/17 [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Christian Corti via cctalk
• 2025/02/16 [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Christian Corti via cctalk
• 2025/02/16 [cctalk] Re: Open source a panacea? Christian Corti via cctalk
• 2025/02/16 [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Van Snyder via cctalk
• 2025/02/16 [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Van Snyder via cctalk
• 2025/02/16 [cctalk] Classic computers with more than one stack pointer, but not FORTH machines. ben via cctalk
• 2025/02/16 [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Chuck Guzis via cctalk
• 2025/02/16 [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Van Snyder via cctalk
• 2025/02/16 [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol ben via cctalk
• 2025/02/16 [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Van Snyder via cctalk
• 2025/02/16 [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Van Snyder via cctalk
• 2025/02/16 [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Paul Koning via cctalk
• 2025/02/16 [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol ben via cctalk
• 2025/02/16 [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Ken Seefried via cctalk
• 2025/02/16 [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol paul.kimpel--- via cctalk
• 2025/02/16 [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Chuck Guzis via cctalk
• 2025/02/16 [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Paul Koning via cctalk
• 2025/02/16 [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Paul Koning via cctalk
• 2025/02/16 [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Chuck Guzis via cctalk
• 2025/02/16 [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Chuck Guzis via cctalk
• 2025/02/16 [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol paul.kimpel--- via cctalk
• 2025/02/16 [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol paul.kimpel--- via cctalk
• 2025/02/16 [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol paul.kimpel--- via cctalk
• 2025/02/16 [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol David Wade via cctalk
• 2025/02/16 [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol paul.kimpel--- via cctalk
• 2025/02/16 [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Ken Seefried via cctalk
• 2025/02/16 [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol paul.kimpel--- via cctalk
• 2025/02/16 [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Wayne S via cctalk
• 2025/02/16 [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Van Snyder via cctalk
• 2025/02/16 [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol paul.kimpel--- via cctalk
• 2025/02/16 [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Cameron Kaiser via cctalk
• 2025/02/16 [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Van Snyder via cctalk
• 2025/02/16 [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Van Snyder via cctalk
• 2025/02/16 [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Dr. Erik Baigar via cctalk
• 2025/02/16 [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Van Snyder via cctalk
• 2025/02/16 [cctalk] Re: RS232 then and now Mike Stein via cctalk
• 2025/02/16 [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Van Snyder via cctalk
• 2025/02/16 [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Paul Koning via cctalk
• 2025/02/16 [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Adrian Stoness via cctalk
• 2025/02/16 [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Cameron Kaiser via cctalk
• 2025/02/16 [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Paul Koning via cctalk
• 2025/02/16 [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Frank Leonhardt via cctalk
• 2025/02/16 [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol David Wise via cctalk
• 2025/02/16 [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Paul Koning via cctalk
• 2025/02/16 [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Chuck Guzis via cctalk
• 2025/02/16 [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol ben via cctalk
• 2025/02/16 [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Paul Koning via cctalk
• 2025/02/16 [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Paul Koning via cctalk
• 2025/02/16 [cctalk] Re: RS232 - parallel modems!? Jon Elson via cctalk
• 2025/02/16 [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Steve Lewis via cctalk
• 2025/02/16 [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Frank Leonhardt via cctalk
• 2025/02/16 [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Frank Leonhardt via cctalk
• 2025/02/15 [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Curious Marc via cctalk
• 2025/02/15 [cctalk] "Re: Re: Elliott Algol" Paul Pierce via cctalk
• 2025/02/15 [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Steve Lewis via cctalk
• 2025/02/15 [cctalk] Re: RS232 - parallel modems!? Steve Lewis via cctalk
• 2025/02/15 [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Van Snyder via cctalk
• 2025/02/15 [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Warner Losh via cctalk
• 2025/02/15 [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Chuck Guzis via cctalk
• 2025/02/15 [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Van Snyder via cctalk
• 2025/02/15 [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol David Wise via cctalk
• 2025/02/15 [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol David Wise via cctalk
• 2025/02/15 [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Jon Elson via cctalk
• 2025/02/15 [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Van Snyder via cctalk
• 2025/02/15 [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Chuck Guzis via cctalk
• 2025/02/15 [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Van Snyder via cctalk
• 2025/02/15 [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Van Snyder via cctalk
• 2025/02/15 [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Van Snyder via cctalk
• 2025/02/15 [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Martin Bishop via cctalk
• 2025/02/15 [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Van Snyder via cctalk
• 2025/02/15 [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Van Snyder via cctalk
• 2025/02/15 [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Paul Koning via cctalk
• 2025/02/15 [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Paul Koning via cctalk
• 2025/02/15 [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Adrian Stoness via cctalk
• 2025/02/15 [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Adrian Stoness via cctalk
• 2025/02/15 [cctalk] Re: RS232 - parallel modems!? Wayne S via cctalk
• 2025/02/15 [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Frank Leonhardt via cctalk
• 2025/02/15 [cctalk] Re: RS232 - parallel modems!? Mike Stein via cctalk
• 2025/02/15 [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Frank Leonhardt via cctalk
• 2025/02/15 [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Frank Leonhardt via cctalk
• 2025/02/15 [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Van Snyder via cctalk
• 2025/02/15 [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol ben via cctalk
• 2025/02/15 [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Henry Bent via cctalk
• 2025/02/15 [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Wayne S via cctalk
• 2025/02/15 [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Van Snyder via cctalk
• 2025/02/15 [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Van Snyder via cctalk
• 2025/02/15 [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Johan Helsingius via cctalk
• 2025/02/15 [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Jon Elson via cctalk
• 2025/02/15 [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol ben via cctalk
• 2025/02/15 [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Adrian Stoness via cctalk
• 2025/02/15 [cctalk] Dan Sokol (and bits about the Apple I and the 6502 procurement) Jim Brain via cctalk
• 2025/02/15 [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Frank Leonhardt via cctalk
• 2025/02/15 [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Frank Leonhardt via cctalk
• 2025/02/15 [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Jon Elson via cctalk
• 2025/02/15 [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Adrian Stoness via cctalk
• 2025/02/15 [cctalk] Re: RS232 then and now (bitbanging) Nigel Johnson Ham via cctalk
• 2025/02/15 [cctalk] Re: Elliott Algol Sid Jones via cctalk
• 2025/02/15 [cctalk] Re: RS232 then and now (bitbanging) Paul Koning via cctalk
• 2025/02/15 [cctalk] Elliott Algol Frank Leonhardt via cctalk
• 2025/02/15 [cctalk] Re: RS232 then and now (bitbanging) Bill Duncan via cctalk
• 2025/02/15 [cctalk] Re: RS232 - parallel modems!? Ethan Dicks via cctalk
• 2025/02/14 [cctalk] Re: RS232 - parallel modems!? Steve Lewis via cctalk

• Earlier messages