Thanks for the info! Missed that the several times I looked at that.
On Mon, May 27, 2024 at 4:51 PM Glen Slick <glen.sl...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mon, May 27, 2024, 12:56 PM Mike Stein via cctalk <cctalk@classiccmp.org> > wrote: >> >> >> (BTW, what's the >> difference between the 68764 and the 68766?) > > > From what I can tell from a quick look at the datasheets, on the 68764 the /E > pin is both a low power mode pin and an output enable pin, while on the 68766 > the /G pin in just an output enable pin. > > So there might be less average power consumed when using the 68764, but the > 68766 data output valid from /G might be quicker than the 68764 data output > valid from /E if the address lines are stable earlier than /E or /G are > asserted. >
