Isnt it most likely that this chain is partially occupied?

Eleanor

On Mon, 22 Jul 2019 at 12:32, <[email protected]> wrote:

> Dear Peer,
>
> I did not check, but I expect that atoms with B-factors exceeding 200 Å2
> will not contribute much to the F's at 2.3 Å. A good test might be to
> calculate Rfree's at 4 or 4.5 Å (no refinement!) to see if the missing
> protein chain contributes at low resolution. If it does, I would keep the
> model, if it doesn't, you can consider removing the model.
>
> My 2 cts,
> Herman
>
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:[email protected]] Im Auftrag von
> Peer Mittl
> Gesendet: Montag, 22. Juli 2019 12:05
> An: [email protected]
> Betreff: [EXTERNAL] [ccp4bb] Density questionable?
>
> EXTERNAL : Real sender is  [email protected]
>
>
>
> Dear Colleagues,
>
> We are working on a structure where the density for a whole protein
> chain (>200 aa) is questionable, since the B-factors exceed 200 Å2 (2.3
> Ang resolution). However, the initial difference density map and the
> feature enhanced map (normal 2fo-fc map to a minor extend) support the
> presence of this chain. Putting the chain seems equally wrong as not
> putting it. Putting it reduces Rfree by 0.3%. As a conservative
> researcher I feel tempted to deposit the structure without this highly
> mobile/weakly occupied chain, but other researchers may say "he has
> missed something". Handling this chain like a weakly occupied water is
> probably wrong, but what is the optimal/correct way? Is there a general
> opinion on how the escape this dilemma?
>
> All the best,
> Peer
>
> ########################################################################
>
> To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
>
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.jiscmail.ac.uk_cgi-2Dbin_webadmin-3FSUBED1-3DCCP4BB-26A-3D1&d=DwID-g&c=Dbf9zoswcQ-CRvvI7VX5j3HvibIuT3ZiarcKl5qtMPo&r=HK-CY_tL8CLLA93vdywyu3qI70R4H8oHzZyRHMQu1AQ&m=O7j1uat8N4jZ5bcK8ivZZRoqkd5rA-z7mp1aFu1o5_I&s=zNdgTjxGzkcfsoQMY49XR7dq0MCRlmBUJxcD_vWG-y4&e=
>
> ########################################################################
>
> To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
> https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1
>

########################################################################

To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1

Reply via email to