Dear Peer,

I did not check, but I expect that atoms with B-factors exceeding 200 Å2 will 
not contribute much to the F's at 2.3 Å. A good test might be to calculate 
Rfree's at 4 or 4.5 Å (no refinement!) to see if the missing protein chain 
contributes at low resolution. If it does, I would keep the model, if it 
doesn't, you can consider removing the model.

My 2 cts,
Herman

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] Im Auftrag von Peer 
Mittl
Gesendet: Montag, 22. Juli 2019 12:05
An: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Betreff: [EXTERNAL] [ccp4bb] Density questionable?

EXTERNAL : Real sender is  owner-ccp...@jiscmail.ac.uk   



Dear Colleagues,

We are working on a structure where the density for a whole protein 
chain (>200 aa) is questionable, since the B-factors exceed 200 Å2 (2.3 
Ang resolution). However, the initial difference density map and the 
feature enhanced map (normal 2fo-fc map to a minor extend) support the 
presence of this chain. Putting the chain seems equally wrong as not 
putting it. Putting it reduces Rfree by 0.3%. As a conservative 
researcher I feel tempted to deposit the structure without this highly 
mobile/weakly occupied chain, but other researchers may say "he has 
missed something". Handling this chain like a weakly occupied water is 
probably wrong, but what is the optimal/correct way? Is there a general 
opinion on how the escape this dilemma?

All the best,
Peer

########################################################################

To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.jiscmail.ac.uk_cgi-2Dbin_webadmin-3FSUBED1-3DCCP4BB-26A-3D1&d=DwID-g&c=Dbf9zoswcQ-CRvvI7VX5j3HvibIuT3ZiarcKl5qtMPo&r=HK-CY_tL8CLLA93vdywyu3qI70R4H8oHzZyRHMQu1AQ&m=O7j1uat8N4jZ5bcK8ivZZRoqkd5rA-z7mp1aFu1o5_I&s=zNdgTjxGzkcfsoQMY49XR7dq0MCRlmBUJxcD_vWG-y4&e=

########################################################################

To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1

Reply via email to