Arrrrrggghhhhh!

Not directed at anyone in particular...

Get over it!  The product has been advertised to be x (as mentioned in
numerous posts in this thread).  If you dont like it, dont buy it.
Dont complain about something that you wont buy.  Dont complain about
something you did buy being fully aware if its limitations prior to
purchase.

The Proctor Labs timings are not suitable to my timezone so I wont buy
them.  They suit many other people's timezones.  I suggest they use
the product as designed.  I wont whinge because I am far too busy!

Now - will I buy this product if the times suited me?  Maybe.

Cheers,
Matt
CCIE #22386
CCSI #31207

On 9 June 2012 13:45, Tom Kacprzynski <[email protected]> wrote:
> This is the last statement I will make on this. If a company has customers
> that would like w,x,y,z, why is the company giving them x and saying you
> don't need w,y,z? (Or in this case have other customers telling other
> customer that they only need x). I hope this analogy makes sense.
>
> It's a business decision not a technical issue. Just a suggestion, nothing
> to keep on going back and forth about endlessly and argue.
>
> Thanks, now back to studying :)
>
> Tom
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 6:42 PM, Marko Milivojevic <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> The only difference would be eating at the beginning and not at the
>> end. Besides, we're not eating up session times. ProctorLab session
>> times are sold as 7:45, unless you have back-to-back sessions, in
>> which case they are 15:45.
>>
>> --
>> Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427 (SP R&S)
>> Senior CCIE Instructor - IPexpert
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 11:01 AM, Jay McMickle <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> > I agree with the scripted cleanup. Why not have a 15 minute gap between
>> session availability and not eat into a students paid 8 hour timeslot?
>> >
>> > This will be even more of an issue with the 4 hour slots you are
>> creating. ;)
>> >
>> > Regards,
>> > Jay McMickle- CCIE #35355 (R&S)
>> > Sent from iJay
>> >
>> > On Jun 8, 2012, at 10:52 AM, Marko Milivojevic <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 10:51 PM, Josh Atterbury
>> >> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >>> Maybe IPX should update the workbooks to say estimated for 7:45 hours
>> :)
>> >>
>> >> Honestly, if someone can finish all the Volume 2 and Volume 3 labs in
>> >> under 8 hours, I'd be beyond impressed. Those 15 minutes really don't
>> >> change anything.
>> >>
>> >> We *could* offer 8 hour time slots, but then it will be students'
>> >> responsibility to clean up the pod they work on. We have had this long
>> >> time ago. Didn't work :-)
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427 (SP R&S)
>> >> Senior CCIE Instructor - IPexpert
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
>> please visit www.ipexpert.com
>> >>
>> >> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
>> >>
>> >> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs
>> _______________________________________________
>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
>> visit www.ipexpert.com
>>
>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
>>
>> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs
>>
> _______________________________________________
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
>
> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs
_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs

Reply via email to