Erik Reuter wrote:
>
> Try Sender:, I find it to be reliable and robust.
>
> And I think you may be in the minority on liking the [Brin-l] in the
> subject. It is redundant, and I still haven't seen a clear reason for
> having it. Unless you are somehow unable to filter on the Sender:
> field??
The place where I find it useful is the place where I have *no* filters
and about as much spam as brin-l mail.
If you'd like to try to talk me through setting up procmail filters on a
Linux machine when I have absolutely no clue as to what I'm doing, you
may very well convince me that I don't need it. :)
Julia
_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
