Try Sender:, I find it to be reliable and robust. And I think you may be in the minority on liking the [Brin-l] in the subject. It is redundant, and I still haven't seen a clear reason for having it. Unless you are somehow unable to filter on the Sender: field??
On Sat, Sep 21, 2002 at 09:18:14AM -0500, Julia Thompson wrote: > This message came as being "from" "John D. Giorgis". No help there. I > get listmail from other people, and I get off-list mail from "John D. > Giorgis". > > The "To" field works -- unless someone bcc's the list, in which case the > filters get thrown off. > > The "Reply-to" field works -- unless your email client doesn't offer > that option (which the one I'm using at this address doesn't). > > And if you don't have any filtering set up, but *all* your mailing lists > use the [listname] convention, you can delete spam unread a *lot* more > easily. -- "Erik Reuter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.erikreuter.net/ _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
