Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hmm, "missing" _fakes_ a given program (with touch, etc.) whereas > mkinstalldirs, install-sh, etc. are the real thing, but implemented > in shell. I don't think these things should be mixed up. The idea of `missing' is to ensure that an installation completes in adverse conditions, the best it could be. If `missing' can fake a missing program by doing its job, this is absolutely fine. If it does less usually, this is because I was too lazy to do it whole (also granted that the effort of _not_ having been lazy would often have been inordinate :-). So, if `missing' ever replaces `install-sh' and `mkinstalldirs', this should be seen as a good thing, absolutely in the spirit of the design of `missing'. -- François Pinard http://www.iro.umontreal.ca/~pinard
- Re: shall `make uninstall' remo... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: shall `make uninstall' remo... Akim Demaille
- Re: shall `make uninstall' remo... Ralf Corsepius
- Re: shall `make uninstall' remo... François Pinard
- Re: shall `make uninstall' remo... Akim Demaille
- Re: shall `make uninstall' remo... François Pinard
- Re: shall `make uninstall' remo... Akim Demaille
- Re: shall `make uninstall' remo... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: shall `make uninstall' remove directories? Peter Eisentraut
- Re: shall `make uninstall' remove directorie... Tom Tromey
- Re: shall `make uninstall' remove directorie... François Pinard
- Re: shall `make uninstall' remove direct... Akim Demaille
- Re: shall `make uninstall' remove direct... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: shall `make uninstall' remove d... François Pinard
- Re: shall `make uninstall' remove directories? Pavel Roskin
- Re: shall `make uninstall' remove directories? Eric Siegerman
- FW: shall `make uninstall' remove directories? Masterson, David
- Re: FW: shall `make uninstall' remove directories? Pavel Roskin
- Re: shall `make uninstall' remove directories? Peter Eisentraut
- RE: FW: shall `make uninstall' remove directories? Masterson, David