François Pinard writes: > So, if `missing' ever replaces `install-sh' and `mkinstalldirs', this > should be seen as a good thing, absolutely in the spirit of the design > of `missing'. Well, I could certainly agree on that `missing mkdir -p' should be made to work, but it could do so by calling mkinstalldirs. These scripts are useful in their own right, even for people who don't know or need the GNU missing script. Once again: one tool for one job. -- Peter Eisentraut Sernanders väg 10:115 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 75262 Uppsala http://yi.org/peter-e/ Sweden
- Re: shall `make uninstall' remo... Ralf Corsepius
- Re: shall `make uninstall' remo... François Pinard
- Re: shall `make uninstall' remo... Akim Demaille
- Re: shall `make uninstall' remo... François Pinard
- Re: shall `make uninstall' remo... Akim Demaille
- Re: shall `make uninstall' remo... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: shall `make uninstall' remove directories? Peter Eisentraut
- Re: shall `make uninstall' remove directorie... Tom Tromey
- Re: shall `make uninstall' remove directorie... François Pinard
- Re: shall `make uninstall' remove direct... Akim Demaille
- Re: shall `make uninstall' remove direct... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: shall `make uninstall' remove d... François Pinard
- Re: shall `make uninstall' remove directories? Pavel Roskin
- Re: shall `make uninstall' remove directories? Eric Siegerman
- FW: shall `make uninstall' remove directories? Masterson, David
- Re: FW: shall `make uninstall' remove directories? Pavel Roskin
- Re: shall `make uninstall' remove directories? Peter Eisentraut
- RE: FW: shall `make uninstall' remove directories? Masterson, David
- Re: FW: shall `make uninstall' remove directories? Eric Siegerman
- Re: shall `make uninstall' remove directories? Lars J. Aas