>>>>> "ois" == ois Pinard <Fran> writes: > So, if `missing' ever replaces `install-sh' and `mkinstalldirs', > this should be seen as a good thing, absolutely in the spirit of the > design of `missing'. I share your opinion. And to answer to the fact that missing is currently part of the Automake kingdom, I'd like to say that it is planed some day to move it under the responsibility of Autoconf. Precisely for such things as `mkdir -p' etc. Akim
- Re: shall `make uninstall' remo... Akim Demaille
- Re: shall `make uninstall' remo... Ralf Corsepius
- Re: shall `make uninstall' remo... François Pinard
- Re: shall `make uninstall' remo... Akim Demaille
- Re: shall `make uninstall' remo... François Pinard
- Re: shall `make uninstall' remo... Akim Demaille
- Re: shall `make uninstall' remo... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: shall `make uninstall' remove directories? Peter Eisentraut
- Re: shall `make uninstall' remove directorie... Tom Tromey
- Re: shall `make uninstall' remove directorie... François Pinard
- Re: shall `make uninstall' remove direct... Akim Demaille
- Re: shall `make uninstall' remove direct... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: shall `make uninstall' remove d... François Pinard
- Re: shall `make uninstall' remove directories? Pavel Roskin
- Re: shall `make uninstall' remove directories? Eric Siegerman
- FW: shall `make uninstall' remove directories? Masterson, David
- Re: FW: shall `make uninstall' remove directories? Pavel Roskin
- Re: shall `make uninstall' remove directories? Peter Eisentraut
- RE: FW: shall `make uninstall' remove directories? Masterson, David
- Re: FW: shall `make uninstall' remove directories? Eric Siegerman