On Sat, Jun 17, 2000 at 08:57:43PM -0700, Mo DeJong wrote: > Ok, how about this patch? It uses cmp instead of wc. > I like this approach because we do not depend on > the output format of the wc program. no: some compilers put timestamps into the object files. -- Thomas E. Dickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://dickey.his.com ftp://dickey.his.com
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG_CC_G, et al, are not ver... Alexandre Oliva
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG_CC_G, et al, are not ver... Alexandre Oliva
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG_CC_G, et al, are not ver... Mo DeJong
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG_CC_G, et al, are not ver... Alexandre Oliva
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG_CC_G, et al, are not ver... Assar Westerlund
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG_CC_G, et al, are not ver... Alexandre Oliva
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG_CC_G, et al, are not ver... Thomas Dickey
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG_CC_G, et al, are not ver... Paul Eggert
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG_CC_G, et al, are not ver... Thomas Dickey
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG_CC_G, et al, are not ver... Paul Eggert
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG_CC_G, et al, are not ver... Thomas Dickey
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG_CC_G, et al, are not ver... Akim Demaille
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG_CC_G, et al, are not ver... Thomas E. Dickey
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG_CC_G, et al, are not ver... Alexandre Oliva
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG_CC_G, et al, are not ver... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG_CC_G, et al, are not ver... Mo DeJong
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG_CC_G, et al, are not ver... Alexandre Oliva
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG_CC_G, et al, are not very rob... Assar Westerlund
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG_CC_G, et al, are not ver... Akim Demaille
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG_CC_G, et al, are not ver... Alexandre Oliva
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG_CC_G, et al, are not ver... Thomas E. Dickey