Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG_CC_G, et al, are not very robust

[Alexandre Oliva]

On Jun 18, 2000, Alexandre Oliva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> On Jun 18, 2000, Mo DeJong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Ok, how about this patch? It uses cmp instead of wc.

> Nope, you must use `tail +16'

+16c, I mean.  Just like GCC's compare.

But it occurs to me that `tail +16c' may not be supported, so we'd
have to somehow detect this and fallback to plain cmp, possibly
misdetecting `-g' as working.

-- 
Alexandre Oliva   Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer                  aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp        oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist    *Please* write to mailing lists, not to me