Mo DeJong writes: > How about merging them into a more generic AC_PROG_COMPILER_G macro > that could test any compiler for the -g flag? That would be nice because then we can undefine it so that AC_PROG_CC et al don't run it. (or any other semi-stable interface to avoid automatic -g in CFLAGS ...) -- Peter Eisentraut Sernanders väg 10:115 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 75262 Uppsala http://yi.org/peter-e/ Sweden
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG_CC... Assar Westerlund
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG_CC... Alexandre Oliva
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG_CC... Thomas Dickey
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG_CC... Paul Eggert
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG_CC... Thomas Dickey
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG_CC... Paul Eggert
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG_CC... Thomas Dickey
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG_CC... Akim Demaille
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG_CC... Thomas E. Dickey
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG_CC... Alexandre Oliva
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG_CC... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG_CC... Mo DeJong
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG_CC... Alexandre Oliva
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG_CC_G, ... Assar Westerlund
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG_CC... Akim Demaille
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG_CC... Alexandre Oliva
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG_CC... Thomas E. Dickey
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG_CC_G, et al, are not very ro... Steven G. Johnson
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG_CC_G, et al, are not ve... Akim Demaille