On 16 Jun 2000, Alexandre Oliva wrote: > On Jun 16, 2000, Akim Demaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>>>>> "Assar" == Assar Westerlund <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Assar> Can't we just run `cc -g' and see if it produces an object > Assar> file? > > > Agreed. This is my own opinion too. > > The current code is trying to save poor developers from dummy users > that ask what this warning about not support debugging means. one can always add a separate test which checks this feature, without imposing it on all autoconf users. -- T.E.Dickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://dickey.his.com ftp://dickey.his.com
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG_CC... Thomas Dickey
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG_CC... Akim Demaille
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG_CC... Thomas E. Dickey
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG_CC... Alexandre Oliva
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG_CC... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG_CC... Mo DeJong
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG_CC... Alexandre Oliva
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG_CC_G, ... Assar Westerlund
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG_CC... Akim Demaille
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG_CC... Alexandre Oliva
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG_CC... Thomas E. Dickey
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG_CC_G, et al, are not very ro... Steven G. Johnson
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG_CC_G, et al, are not ve... Akim Demaille