On Jun 17, 2000, Mo DeJong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > That does not seem like a very good idea. The default should be > -g -02 so that a binary will run with some optimizations and > still be debugable in case of a crash. Agreed. -- Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/ Red Hat GCC Developer aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com} CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org} Free Software Evangelist *Please* write to mailing lists, not to me
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG_CC... Thomas Dickey
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG_CC... Paul Eggert
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG_CC... Thomas Dickey
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG_CC... Paul Eggert
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG_CC... Thomas Dickey
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG_CC... Akim Demaille
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG_CC... Thomas E. Dickey
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG_CC... Alexandre Oliva
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG_CC... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG_CC... Mo DeJong
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG_CC... Alexandre Oliva
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG_CC_G, ... Assar Westerlund
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG_CC... Akim Demaille
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG_CC... Alexandre Oliva
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG_CC... Thomas E. Dickey
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG_CC_G, et al, are not very ro... Steven G. Johnson
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG_CC_G, et al, are not ve... Akim Demaille