>>>>> "Alexandre" == Alexandre Oliva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Alexandre> On Jun 14, 2000, Mo DeJong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Perhaps this is a silly idea, but why don't you just run the >> compiler without the -g flag to make sure that it created a >> conftest.o file, and then run with the -g flag but check that the >> produced conftest.o is larger than the first one. Alexandre> I like this approach! Fine with me too. Mo, yet another patch? :)
- [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG_CC_G, et al, are not very robust Akim Demaille
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG_CC_G, et al, are not ver... Alexandre Oliva
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG_CC_G, et al, are not... Akim Demaille
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG_CC_G, et al, are... Alexandre Oliva
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG_CC_G, et al,... Akim Demaille
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG_CC_G, e... Mo DeJong
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG_CC_... Alexandre Oliva
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG... Akim Demaille
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG... Mo DeJong
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG... Thomas E. Dickey
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG... Mo DeJong
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG... Akim Demaille
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG... Thomas E. Dickey
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG... Mo DeJong
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG... Alexandre Oliva
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG... Mo DeJong
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG... Alexandre Oliva
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG... Alexandre Oliva