On Fri, 16 Jun 2000, Mo DeJong wrote: > Well, something like the following patch would work. ...something like (there are two places the look like problems): > +ac_cv_prog_cc_g_smaller=`od conftest_smaller.o` od will suppress rows that contain only 0's, making the size look different. > +if test $ac_cv_prog_cc_g_bigger -gt $ac_cv_prog_cc_g_smaller ; then why do you think the output of `od` will be a single number? (Perhaps output of 'ls', but that gets into the problem of getting a format of ls). Better to simply run a test program that uses only stdio.h (checking if opening the object file in binary mode works ;-) -- T.E.Dickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://dickey.his.com ftp://dickey.his.com
- [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG_CC_G, et al, are not very robust Akim Demaille
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG_CC_G, et al, are not ver... Alexandre Oliva
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG_CC_G, et al, are not... Akim Demaille
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG_CC_G, et al, are... Alexandre Oliva
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG_CC_G, et al,... Akim Demaille
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG_CC_G, e... Mo DeJong
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG_CC_... Alexandre Oliva
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG... Akim Demaille
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG... Mo DeJong
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG... Thomas E. Dickey
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG... Mo DeJong
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG... Akim Demaille
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG... Thomas E. Dickey
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG... Mo DeJong
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG... Alexandre Oliva
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG... Mo DeJong
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG... Alexandre Oliva
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG... Alexandre Oliva
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG... Mo DeJong
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG... Alexandre Oliva