On Jun 16, 2000, Mo DeJong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I like that wc -c a lot better, we can just do this. Of course > this depends on the output format of wc, is it going to > be the same everywhere? I'm not even sure `wc -c' will be available everywhere :-( I still think using cmp is the best solution. -- Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/ Red Hat GCC Developer aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com} CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org} Free Software Evangelist *Please* write to mailing lists, not to me
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG_CC_G, et al, are not very rob... Akim Demaille
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG_CC_G, et al, are not ver... Mo DeJong
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG_CC_G, et al, are not... Alexandre Oliva
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG_CC_G, et al, are... Akim Demaille
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG_CC_G, et al, are... Mo DeJong
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG_CC_G, et al, are... Thomas E. Dickey
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG_CC_G, et al, are... Mo DeJong
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG_CC_G, et al, are... Akim Demaille
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG_CC_G, et al, are... Thomas E. Dickey
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG_CC_G, et al, are... Mo DeJong
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG_CC_G, et al, are... Alexandre Oliva
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG_CC_G, et al, are... Mo DeJong
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG_CC_G, et al, are... Alexandre Oliva
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG_CC_G, et al, are... Alexandre Oliva
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG_CC_G, et al, are... Mo DeJong
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG_CC_G, et al, are... Alexandre Oliva
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG_CC_G, et al, are... Assar Westerlund
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG_CC_G, et al, are... Alexandre Oliva
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG_CC_G, et al, are... Thomas Dickey
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG_CC_G, et al, are... Paul Eggert
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG_CC_G, et al, are... Thomas Dickey