On Jun 14, 2000, Mo DeJong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Perhaps this is a silly idea, but why don't you just run the compiler > without the -g flag to make sure that it created a conftest.o file, > and then run with the -g flag but check that the produced conftest.o > is larger than the first one. I like this approach! -- Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/ Red Hat GCC Developer aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com} CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org} Free Software Evangelist *Please* write to mailing lists, not to me
- [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG_CC_G, et al, are not very robust Akim Demaille
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG_CC_G, et al, are not ver... Alexandre Oliva
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG_CC_G, et al, are not... Akim Demaille
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG_CC_G, et al, are... Alexandre Oliva
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG_CC_G, et al,... Akim Demaille
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG_CC_G, e... Mo DeJong
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG_CC_... Alexandre Oliva
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG... Akim Demaille
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG... Mo DeJong
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG... Thomas E. Dickey
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG... Mo DeJong
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG... Akim Demaille
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG... Thomas E. Dickey
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG... Mo DeJong
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG... Alexandre Oliva
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG... Mo DeJong
- Re: [gnu.utils.bug] AC_PROG... Alexandre Oliva